So I also know from young that the forbiden tree was an apple tree and the fruit from which Adam took a bite was an apple.
Satan is usually seen as a fallen angel. In Abrahamic religions, fallen angels are angels who were expelled from Heaven. The term "fallen angel" appears neither in the Bible nor in other Abrahamic scripture, but is used of angels who were cast out of heaven or angels who sinned. Such angels are often malevolent towards humanity. The idea of fallen angels derived from Jewish Enochic pseudepigraphy... (text from wikipedia.com search Satan).
The term "fallen angel" derrives neither from the Bible nor from other Abrahamic scripture but from Jewish Enochic pseudepigraphy.
1 The serpent was more clever than any of the wild animals the Lord God had made. The serpent said to the woman, “Did God really say, ‘You must not eat fruit from any tree in the garden’?”
2... to 10...
11 The Lord God said, “Who told you that you were naked? Have you eaten fruit from the tree I commanded you not to eat from?”
12 The man said, “It’s the fault of the woman you put here with me. She gave me some fruit from the tree. And I ate it.”
13 Then the Lord God said to the woman, “What have you done?” The woman said, “The serpent tricked me. That’s why I ate the fruit.”
14 So the Lord God spoke to the serpent. He said, “Because you have done this...
Do you want others to lose what you lost ?
First animal: EVIL!
Second animal: NO, NATURE!
First animal: EVIL!
First animal slightly challanges the ever hidden and ever mischivious EVIL because of the second animal ablivious disbelief "THROWS STONE"
Second animal still oblivious : NATURE!
First animal: EVIL!
First animal drops its awarness and becomes vulnerable himself because the oblivious other animal "POKES HIM WITH STICK and says, IT`S HIM THE EVIL LOOK and splashes water at HIM before forgeting completely that DEVIL is also called EVIL and jumps right ON to it`s DOOM!
Second animal now becomes the first animal to the third animal right next to it who heard it all before but still like all others obliviously disbelive. And so we never get to learn or even less teach further!
I somehow think that there really are people who pretend to believe in something only to turn others away from believing. Let's say that somehow the gates of heaven are guarded by the EVIL ONE whom instead prevents anyone to escape hell, sneacking the wrong teaching in the right book would aid HIM a 2ooong way.
I went through education from having to cover my eyes when watching people kissing in a movie and hear people exclaming in acusativ when they began to see people kissing in pupblic to understanding open marrieges, should I call myself higly educated person, and what if I find that all this knowledge dehumanises me? I have also learned from news that the lack of knowledge for girls in Middle-East is a major problem that needs to be addressed and I also learned from news that in the western world sexual education is either taught or is about to be introduced as compulsory module. I remember when I first heard someone say the word sex, it was in the sixth year of school in biology laboratory when the teacher used it to describe the difference between the male and female animals, we all started to giggle, shy and blush. Now what's the meaning of using a polite and decent language to explain someone what twerking is since it is all over the internet and TV, and can we use the same principle to describe a lot more indecent acts and such making them decent? I guess sex education is nothing but this principle, using a polite and decent language to teach indecent actions to young, eeem i rigghht?
Have we been in a greenhouse allalong and yet miraculously not suffocate ourselves?
So if in none of the 7 days of creation corruption was not mentioned and there is ONE who chose to fall before there was even a notion of corruption how does anyone fall into sin the same way HE fell?
If sining on your own is your sin and if being seduced into sin CAN carry less guilt, then being demon possessed into sin carries how much guilt and it is who's sin?
And since there is corruption can we still sin on our own?
And a person that is demon possessed into sin, is repenting for who's sins?
And if you loose something you can never get back while demon possesd into sin then it is called WHAT?
And if you are demon possessed while you learn about free will, you will understand what?
And if you are demon possessed while you teach about free will, you will teach what?
And can free will and corruption coexist?
And if I`m possessed against my will or even more possessed unawarely can I still think of free will?
Now if you know you are demmon possessed and you consent to sining does it carry more guilt than sinning on your own?
Or if you know you are demon possesed but you don't realize what you are consenting to do while possessed does it carry more or less guilt then sinning on your own?
Further and threre should be more ways in which people can side with the bad ONE, if you know you are possessed and you consent to sining but deny the help to realize what you are doing, compares how towarards sinning on your own and any other way possible?
Will you understand or teach free will the way the one that possesses you watnts you to understand or teach?
And if you learned from one who was not himself or demon possessed what the ONE who possessed him wanted to teach, will you simply teach further or have the power to tell the good from the bad?
And if the ONE who possessed him teaches us and seals HIS teaching in the name of God for us not to dare tell good from bad we need what to be able to breack the wrong notions?
Using the medical term sympthoms to describe possession. If the sympthoms of possession are from as severe as not being able control yourself to as little as not be aware that it is not your judgement or yourself then what is the meaning of a judging system?
If you are demon possessed into wrong and taken before a demon possessed person to be judged it is called what?
And if only God can judge, then attempting to make a judging system while we don`t know if it is our thoughts or ourselfs we are trying to build what?
And should we try and itentify all the sympthoms that can tell a person is possessed to the most smallest symthom or should we assume that this symptoms are made detectable to us only to make us believe that we can learn to overcome HIM and therefore lead us into a false feeling of security, I'd say there are ways in wich we can never tell we are poseesed.
Simple, one going to the attakers side leaves the defending side with a need for two defenders, one to replace the one who leaves and one more to defend against the one who fell?
Once in a maths class I remember the teacher saying regarding the so called lack of knowledge "If I were a litlle stupid I`d have lived such a happy life!" as if he realised that knowing more is loosing more. Now I wish I still HAD THE KNOWLEDGE TO NOT understand not even simple negtive mathematics like 2-3=-1. I remember the late nights when I was young my parrents tried to teach me these notions or the visits to neighbours with children older than me to try and teach me the basics of maths. I truly think we are meant not to know more than we should.
One other teacher said that: "A man no matter how wicked can be still has some fellings, only a robot has none what so ever" and I'd like to add that "Becuse it's lack of feelings you cannot plea for forgivness to a robot, or even less, politely appologise".